Stoner v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.

Third Circuit

Stoner v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.

945 F.2d 396, 1991 WL 194715

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedSeptember 24, 1991

Docket90-3489

StatusPublished

This text of 945 F.2d 396 (Stoner v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoner v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co., 945 F.2d 396, 1991 WL 194715 (3d Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

945 F.2d 396

Stoner (Charles A., Dorothy)
v.
Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Company, Rhein Braun U.S.,
Monongahela Railway Company, Boggs (David), Pollock (Ewing),
Pollock, Pollock and Thomas, The Upshur agency, Inc.,
Consolidated Coal Company, Consol-Land Development Company,
Rheinische Braunkohlenwerke, Verkaufsgesellschaft (Maria Therese)

NO. 90-3489

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

SEP 24, 1991

Appeal From: W.D.Pa.,

Smith, J.,

740 F.Supp. 1126

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI