Stoneman v. Smyth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Stoneman v. Smyth

190 N.W. 607, 153 Minn. 554, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 857

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 3, 1922

DocketNo. 22,952

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 N.W. 607 (Stoneman v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoneman v. Smyth, 190 N.W. 607, 153 Minn. 554, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 857 (Mich. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to that of Lillian M. Stoneman against the same defendants, supra, page 331. It was submitted upon the record therein, and the same disposition must follow, viz.:

The judgment against the defendant and appellant Smyth is affirmed and the judgment in favor of t'he defendant and respondent WashburnCrosby Company is reversed, and the cause is remitted with direction to the court below to enter judgment upon the verdict rendered against said respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to that of Lillian M. Stoneman against the same defendants, supra, page 331. It was submitted upon the record therein, and the same disposition must follow, viz.:

The judgment against the defendant and appellant Smyth is affirmed and the judgment in favor of t'he defendant and respondent WashburnCrosby Company is reversed, and the cause is remitted with direction to the court below to enter judgment upon the verdict rendered against said respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.W. 607, 153 Minn. 554, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoneman-v-smyth-minn-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack