Stoneman v. Smyth
190 N.W. 607, 153 Minn. 554, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 857
Opinion
This is a companion case to that of Lillian M. Stoneman against the same defendants, supra, page 331. It was submitted upon the record therein, and the same disposition must follow, viz.:
The judgment against the defendant and appellant Smyth is affirmed and the judgment in favor of t'he defendant and respondent WashburnCrosby Company is reversed, and the cause is remitted with direction to the court below to enter judgment upon the verdict rendered against said respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stoneman v. Smyth, 190 N.W. 607, 153 Minn. 554, 1922 Minn. LEXIS 857 (Mich. 1922).
190 N.W. 607 (Stoneman v. Smyth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Flaaten v. Lyons
196 N.W. 478 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)