Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc.

148 So. 557, 110 Fla. 107
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 6, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 148 So. 557 (Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc., 148 So. 557, 110 Fla. 107 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-mited to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for respective parties,, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it Seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See opinion in Stoneman Co. v. Briggs filed at this' term.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
148 So. 557, 110 Fla. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoneman-co-v-briggs-warr-inc-fla-1933.