Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc.

148 So. 557, 110 Fla. 107

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 6, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-mited to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for respective parties,, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it Seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See opinion in Stoneman Co. v. Briggs filed at this' term.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been sub-mited to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for respective parties,, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it Seems to the Court that there is no error in said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed. See opinion in Stoneman Co. v. Briggs filed at this' term.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc., 148 So. 557, 110 Fla. 107 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

148 So. 557 (Stoneman Co. v. Briggs & Warr, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.