Stoneham v. Bondy

248 A.D. 787
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to compel an accounting by trustees under certain trust agreements, order dismissing plaintiffs’ amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, the language of the last paragraph in each of the agreements in question shows that they are made “ in hen of ” and “ to take the place ” of the prior agreement and to cancel such prior agreement. No allegation of cancellation of such prior agreement is, therefore, necessary. Defendants may serve an answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoneham v. Bondy, 248 A.D. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 787 (Stoneham v. Bondy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stoneham v. Bondy
249 A.D. 852 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)