Stonecypher v. State

112 S.E. 830, 28 Ga. App. 671, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 769
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1922
Docket13471
StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 830 (Stonecypher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stonecypher v. State, 112 S.E. 830, 28 Ga. App. 671, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 769 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial was based on general grounds only. No error of law appearing, and there being some evidence to support the verdict, the judgment must, under repeated rulings of this and the Supreme Court, be

Affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 S.E. 830, 28 Ga. App. 671, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stonecypher-v-state-gactapp-1922.