Stoneburg v. Stoneburg

Supreme Court of Florida

Stoneburg v. Stoneburg

151 So. 700, 113 Fla. 315, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1747

DecidedDecember 19, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 700 (Stoneburg v. Stoneburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoneburg v. Stoneburg, 151 So. 700, 113 Fla. 315, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1747 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

On Rehearing as to Order Denying Allowance of Suit Money on Appeal.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon rehearing of appellant’s petition for an order requiring the appellee to pay the costs of preparing the transcript of the record on appeal, together with the clerk’s filing fee, and the Court having reheard and reconsidered the appellant’s application and it appearing that appellant has been paid by appellee a large sum of money incidental to the divorce decree appealed from, as and for a lump sum allowance for her benefit, which sum of money she has accepted and is enjoying under the decree, it seems to the Court that a further allowance of moneys to be paid to appellant pending appeal is not warranted at this time; therefore, the previous denial of appellant’s petition is adhered to on this rehearing, with leave of appellant to file transcript of the record herein at her own expense within sixty days from the date of this order. It is ordered accordingly.

*316 Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J-. J., concur.

. Brown,- J., abs'ent and not participating because of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing as to Order Denying Allowance of Suit Money on Appeal.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard upon rehearing of appellant’s petition for an order requiring the appellee to pay the costs of preparing the transcript of the record on appeal, together with the clerk’s filing fee, and the Court having reheard and reconsidered the appellant’s application and it appearing that appellant has been paid by appellee a large sum of money incidental to the divorce decree appealed from, as and for a lump sum allowance for her benefit, which sum of money she has accepted and is enjoying under the decree, it seems to the Court that a further allowance of moneys to be paid to appellant pending appeal is not warranted at this time; therefore, the previous denial of appellant’s petition is adhered to on this rehearing, with leave of appellant to file transcript of the record herein at her own expense within sixty days from the date of this order. It is ordered accordingly.

*316 Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J-. J., concur.

. Brown,- J., abs'ent and not participating because of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 So. 700, 113 Fla. 315, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 1747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoneburg-v-stoneburg-fla-1933.