Stoneberg v. Stoneberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stoneberg v. Stoneberg

79 A.D.2d 685, 433 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14069

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 22, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 685 (Stoneberg v. Stoneberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stoneberg v. Stoneberg, 79 A.D.2d 685, 433 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the husband, Alfred Stoneberg, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 21, 1979, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed that he pay the petitioner child support beyond his daughter’s twenty-first birthday. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. The father’s responsibility to contribute towards the support of his daughter, Ellen, as required by the parties’ separation agreement, which was incorporated into their divorce decree, was to continue until Ellen’s twenty-second birthday only if she diligently and continuously pursued a four-year course of college study. Since Ellen failed to do this, his duty to make such support payments by the terms of the separation agreement terminated upon her twenty-first birthday, November 6, 1978, and it was error for the Family Court to require support payments beyond that date. It was also error for the Family Court to grant the appellant a credit for periods of time prior to Ellen’s twenty-first birthday within her college years during which she did not attend school and, instead, engaged in part-time employment. With the exception of several contingencies not involved here, the parties’ agreement required payment of child support until Ellen attained the age of 21 regardless of her educational status. Therefore, the father must pay petitioner arrears calculated from September 7, 1977, the date on which he stopped making child support payments, to November 6, 1978, Ellen’s twenty-first birth[686]*686day. Upon remand, the Family Court shall recalculate the arrearage for this 61-week period and provide for the return to the father of any moneys paid pursuant to the order appealed from in excess of such amount. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the husband, Alfred Stoneberg, appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, dated August 21, 1979, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed that he pay the petitioner child support beyond his daughter’s twenty-first birthday. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith. The father’s responsibility to contribute towards the support of his daughter, Ellen, as required by the parties’ separation agreement, which was incorporated into their divorce decree, was to continue until Ellen’s twenty-second birthday only if she diligently and continuously pursued a four-year course of college study. Since Ellen failed to do this, his duty to make such support payments by the terms of the separation agreement terminated upon her twenty-first birthday, November 6, 1978, and it was error for the Family Court to require support payments beyond that date. It was also error for the Family Court to grant the appellant a credit for periods of time prior to Ellen’s twenty-first birthday within her college years during which she did not attend school and, instead, engaged in part-time employment. With the exception of several contingencies not involved here, the parties’ agreement required payment of child support until Ellen attained the age of 21 regardless of her educational status. Therefore, the father must pay petitioner arrears calculated from September 7, 1977, the date on which he stopped making child support payments, to November 6, 1978, Ellen’s twenty-first birth[686]*686day. Upon remand, the Family Court shall recalculate the arrearage for this 61-week period and provide for the return to the father of any moneys paid pursuant to the order appealed from in excess of such amount. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 685, 433 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoneberg-v-stoneberg-nyappdiv-1980.