Stonebarger v. Stonebarger
This text of 72 P. 1101 (Stonebarger v. Stonebarger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court thereon are correct under the law announced in the instructions. No exceptions were taken to the instructions given, nor were any exceptions saved to the refusal of the court to give those requested, therefore the instructions are the law of the case, and if the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court are within the law thus expressed, the judgment should be affirmed. No prejudicial error appears to have been committed on any of the other grounds urged by plaintiff in error.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 P. 1101, 66 Kan. 796, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stonebarger-v-stonebarger-kan-1903.