Stone v. Williams General Corp.

642 S.E.2d 211, 283 Ga. App. 581, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 423, 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 119
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 14, 2007
DocketA03A1813
StatusPublished

This text of 642 S.E.2d 211 (Stone v. Williams General Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. Williams General Corp., 642 S.E.2d 211, 283 Ga. App. 581, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 423, 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 119 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Ruffin, Judge.

In Stone v. Williams Gen. Corp.,1 we reversed the trial court, concluding that a RICO conspiracy cannot exist between a corporation and its officer because a corporation is not a “person” within the meaning of the Georgia RICO statute. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed, holding that “a corporation is a ‘person’ for purposes of the Georgia civil RICO act.”2 Accordingly, we vacate our earlier opinion and adopt the judgment of the Supreme Court as our own. The case is remanded to the trial court for entry of a judgment consistent with this opinion.

Judgment vacated and case remanded.

Smith, P. J., and Miller, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams General Corp. v. Stone
632 S.E.2d 376 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2006)
Stone v. Williams General Corp.
619 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 S.E.2d 211, 283 Ga. App. 581, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 423, 2007 Ga. App. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-williams-general-corp-gactapp-2007.