Stone v. United States
This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 807 (Stone v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeals listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that cost of production is the proper basis upon which to find values for the subject bicycles, and that such cost of production, as set out in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the invoice unit price per bicycle, less nondutiable charges, plus packing.
Based upon the agreed statement of facts, I find the cost of production for the subject bicycles to be the invoice unit prices per bicycle, less nondutiable charges, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Cust. Ct. 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-united-states-cusc-1958.