Stone v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 807
United States Customs Court·Decided May 1, 1958·No. Reap. Dec. 9141; Entry No. 755, etc.·Published

Opinion

Fohd, Judge:

The appeals listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation to the effect that cost of production is the proper basis upon which to find values for the subject bicycles, and that such cost of production, as set out in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the invoice unit price per bicycle, less nondutiable charges, plus packing.

Based upon the agreed statement of facts, I find the cost of production for the subject bicycles to be the invoice unit prices per bicycle, less nondutiable charges, plus packing. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 807 (cusc 1958).

40 Cust. Ct. 807 (Stone v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.