Stone v. Stone
This text of 10 Ky. Op. 33 (Stone v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
There is sufficient in the record to sustain the judgment of the lower court.
The evidence strongly tends to show that the land in which appellant claims dower was sold under decretal sale in an action to which she was a party, and having failed then to assert claim she is es-topped to enforce it now. The papers in the case in which the decree for sale was rendered were lost, and nothing appears except a decree for sale, confirmation of commissioner’s report of sale, and a few other unimportant orders. The absence of an order of consolidation, the failure to describe the land to be sold, and the other defects pointed out by the appellant’s counsel, are mere irregularities that might have been corrected by appeal, and do not render the judgment void. Dugan v. Massey, 6 Bush 81.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Ky. Op. 33, 1878 Ky. LEXIS 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-stone-kyctapp-1878.