Stone v. Stone

691 So. 2d 649, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4167, 1997 WL 194853
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 23, 1997·No. No. 97-575·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the petitioner voluntarily dismissed the underlying action, the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the subsequent orders adjudicating matters set forth in the underlying action. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of prohibition and vacate the subsequently entered orders. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.420(a); 84 Lumber Co. v. Cooper, 656 So.2d 1297, 1298-99 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)(holding that dismissal pursuant to Rule 1.420(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, divests trial court of subject matter jurisdiction); In re Estate of Zim-[650] brick, 453 So.2d 1155, 1156 n. 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)(holding that Florida Rules of Civil Procedure apply to adversary probate proceedings).

Petition granted; orders vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone v. Stone, 691 So. 2d 649, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4167, 1997 WL 194853 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 649 (Stone v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Matos Rebolledo v. Cambero Cordero
217 So. 3d 147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Tobkin v. State
777 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)