Stone v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Stone v. State

1937 OK CR 15, 64 P.2d 939, 60 Okla. Crim. 292, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 12

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 27, 1937

DocketNo. A-9145.

StatusPublished

This text of 1937 OK CR 15 (Stone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stone v. State, 1937 OK CR 15, 64 P.2d 939, 60 Okla. Crim. 292, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 12 (Okla. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of stealing an automobile, and sentenced to serve a term of eleven years in the state penitentiary, and appeals.

The record in this case was filed in this court on May 20, 1936. The case was submitted on the record on October 6, 1936, and plaintiff in error given thirty days in which to file brief, which thirty days expired and plaintiff in error was given an additional ten days in which to file brief, which extension of time expired November 16, 1936, since which time no request has been made and no reason given why a brief has not been filed. The court therefore assumed that the appeal has been abandoned, or that counsel representing the plaintiff in error has reached the conclusion there were no errors in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal.

The record has been carefully examined, and the examination fails to disclose any fundamental errors. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of stealing an automobile, and sentenced to serve a term of eleven years in the state penitentiary, and appeals.

The record in this case was filed in this court on May 20, 1936. The case was submitted on the record on October 6, 1936, and plaintiff in error given thirty days in which to file brief, which thirty days expired and plaintiff in error was given an additional ten days in which to file brief, which extension of time expired November 16, 1936, since which time no request has been made and no reason given why a brief has not been filed. The court therefore assumed that the appeal has been abandoned, or that counsel representing the plaintiff in error has reached the conclusion there were no errors in the record sufficient to warrant a reversal.

The record has been carefully examined, and the examination fails to disclose any fundamental errors. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury.

The case is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1937 OK CR 15, 64 P.2d 939, 60 Okla. Crim. 292, 1937 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-state-oklacrimapp-1937.