Stone v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stone v. State

497 S.W.3d 872, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 2016 WL 4598532

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 6, 2016·No. NO. ED 103164·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joshua Stone appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Joshua Stone appeals from the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 after an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Stone v. State, 497 S.W.3d 872, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 871, 2016 WL 4598532 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

497 S.W.3d 872 (Stone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.