Stone v. State

100 S.E. 21, 24 Ga. App. 67, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 410
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1919
Docket10598
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 21 (Stone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. State, 100 S.E. 21, 24 Ga. App. 67, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 410 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. An accusation under Section 682 of the Penal Code, charging the offense of bastardy, which fails to allege distinctly that the defendant is the father of a bastard child, is fatally defective. A recital in the accusation that the prosecutrix had made an affidavit before a justice of the peace that the defendant was the father of a bastard child does not amount to an allegation that the defendant is the father of such child. Locke v. State, 3 Ga. 534; Hudson v. State, 104 Ga. 723 (30 S. E. 947).

2. The motion in arrest of judgment should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Locke v. State
3 Ga. 534 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
Hudson v. State
30 S.E. 947 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 21, 24 Ga. App. 67, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-state-gactapp-1919.