Stone v. State
This text of 598 P.2d 72 (Stone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alaska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Upon appellant’s plea of no contest to eleven counts of forgery,1 the superior court imposed a sentence of four years on each count,2 to run concurrently. Appellant was made eligible for parole at the discretion of [73]*73the parole board.3 In this appeal she challenges the court’s sentence as excessive.4
Our review of the record fails to persuade us that the superior court was clearly mistaken in imposing the sanction that it did.5 Accordingly, its sentence is affirmed. McClain v. State, 519 P.2d 811 (Alaska 1974).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 P.2d 72, 1979 Alas. LEXIS 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-state-alaska-1979.