Stone v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Stone v. State

64 So. 158, 9 Ala. App. 66, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 121

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 13, 1914

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 So. 158 (Stone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stone v. State, 64 So. 158, 9 Ala. App. 66, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 121 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PELHAM, J. —

The indictment charges living in adultery or fornication, in the form prescribed by the Code (Cr. Code, p. 672, form 69), and the jury were not required, in finding the defendant guilty, to specify •which of the alternative related charges contained in [67]*67tbe indictment, i. e., adultery or fornication, they found to be true. — White v. State, 74 Ala. 31.

The record contains no error, and the judgment of conviction, appealed from on the record without a bill of exceptions, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PELHAM, J. —

The indictment charges living in adultery or fornication, in the form prescribed by the Code (Cr. Code, p. 672, form 69), and the jury were not required, in finding the defendant guilty, to specify •which of the alternative related charges contained in [67]*67tbe indictment, i. e., adultery or fornication, they found to be true. — White v. State, 74 Ala. 31.

The record contains no error, and the judgment of conviction, appealed from on the record without a bill of exceptions, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 So. 158, 9 Ala. App. 66, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-state-alactapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack