Stone v. Starcher

Fourth Circuit

Stone v. Starcher

105 F. App'x 523

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2004·No. No. 04-1574·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stone v. Starcher, No. CA-04-44-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & May 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stone v. Starcher, No. CA-04-44-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & May 3, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Stone v. Starcher, 105 F. App'x 523 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

105 F. App'x 523 (Stone v. Starcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.