Stone v. Starcher

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 7, 2004
• Docket: 04-1574
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1574

TAMMY M. STONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LARRY STARCHER, Chief Supreme Court Justice,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-04-44-2)

Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: September 7, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying

Stone’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis

and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Stone v.

Starcher, No. CA-04-44-2 (S.D.W. Va. Apr. 1 & May 3, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -