Stone v. Smith
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 DUSTY STONE,
3 Plaintiff-Appellant,
4 v. No. 32,814
5 ROBIN H. SMITH and ALETA SMITH,
6 Defendants-Appellees.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY 8 Albert J. Mitchell, Jr., District Judge
9 Dusty Stone 10 San Jon, NM
11 Pro se Appellant
12 Donald C. Schutte 13 Tucumcari, NM
14 for Appellees
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION
16 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the third notice of
2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,
3 and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} Affirmed.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
9 WE CONCUR:
10 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
12 13 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stone v. Smith (Stone v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.