Stone v. Smith
This text of Stone v. Smith (Stone v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
YVONNE STONE,1 § § No. 198, 2022 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File No. CN19-01311 CALVIN SMITH, § Petition No. 22-01774 § Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: November 17, 2023 Decided: January 12, 2024
Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.
ORDER
On May 25, 2023, the Court remanded this matter to the Family Court “for
the limited purpose of allowing the court to clarify what amount, if any, the
[appellant] is obligated to reimburse the [appellee] for the trial testimony of Dr.
Zingaro.”2 On remand, the Family Court allowed the parties to supplement the
record and thereafter determined that the appellant is obligated to reimburse the
appellee for $375, or one-half of Dr. Zingaro’s fee for testifying at trial, under the
Family Court’s January 6, 2020 order addressing the allocation of expenses between
the parties. The record supports the Family Court’s decision.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). 2 Stone v. Smith, Del. Supr. No. 198, 2022, Traynor, J. (May 25, 2023) (ORDER). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family
Court be AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stone v. Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-smith-del-2024.