Stone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 4, 2025·No. 23-1645V·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-1645V

KERRI STONE, as parent and natural Chief Special Master Corcoran guardian of E.L., a minor, Filed: February 28, 2025 Petitioner, v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Amy A. Senerth, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for Petitioner.

Christopher Pinto, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On September 25, 2023, Kerri Stone (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation on behalf of her minor son, E.L., under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that E.L. suffered the Table injury of an intussusception following a rotavirus vaccination administered on February 8, 2023. Petition, ECF No. 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 15, 2024, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding Petitioner entitled to compensation for intussusception. On February 5, 2025, Respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating Petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy an AmeriHealth Caritas Medicaid lien in the amount of $24,908.03, and an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 to purchase an annuity contract pursuant to the terms of Section II.B

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). of the Proffer. Proffer at 1-4. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, I find that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, I award Petitioner the following:

A. A lump sum payment of $24,908.03, representing compensation for satisfaction of the AmeriHealth Caritas Medicaid lien, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and:

MultiPlan 535 E. Diehl Road, Suite 100 Naperville, IL 60563 File #: 774116 Attn: Louise Holte

Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to MultiPlan for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien.

B. An amount of $50,000.00 to purchase the annuity contract described above in Section II.B of the Proffer.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under Section 15(a).

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

E.L., a minor, by and through his parent, and natural guardian, KERRI STONE,

Petitioner, No. 23-1645V Chief Special Master Corcoran v. ECF

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER OF DAMAGES

I. Procedural History

On September 25, 2023, Kerri Stone (“petitioner”), as parent and natural guardian of her

minor son, E.L., filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury

Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that E.L. suffered

an intussusception, a Table injury, following a rotavirus vaccination administered on February 8,

2023. Petition at 1. On May 10, 2024, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) Report at 1. ECF

No. 16. Accordingly, on May 15, 2024 the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement,

finding that petitioner is entitled to vaccine compensation. ECF No. 20.

II. Items of Compensation and Form of the Award

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers, and the parties recommend, that

compensation be made through a lump sum and future annuity payments as described below, and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following:1

A. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded funds to satisfy an AmeriHealth

Caritas Medicaid lien in the amount of $24,908.03, which represents full satisfaction of any right

of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action AmeriHealth Caritas Medicaid may

have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments AmeriHealth Caritas Medicaid

has made to or on behalf of E.L. from the date of his eligibility for benefits through the date of

judgment in this case as a result of E.L.’s vaccine-related injury suffered on or about February 8,

2023, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act. Reimbursement of the AmeriHealth Caritas

Medicaid lien shall be made through a lump sum payment of $24,908.03, representing

compensation for satisfaction of the AmeriHealth Caritas Medicaid lien, in the form of a check

payable jointly to petitioner and:

MultiPlan 535 E. Diehl Road, Suite 100 Naperville, IL 60563 File #: 774116 Attn: Louise Holte

Petitioner agrees to endorse the check to MultiPlan for satisfaction of the Medicaid lien.

1 Should E.L. die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.

2 B. Pain and Suffering

For pain and suffering, an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 to purchase an annuity

contract, 2 paid to the life insurance company3 from which the annuity will be purchased, 4 subject

to the conditions described below, that will provide payments to E.L. as set forth below:

a. A certain Lump Sum of $38,541.76 payable on October 1, 2043.

b. A certain Lump Sum of $43,699.53 payable on October 1, 2046.

c. A certain Lump Sum of $50,213.92 payable on October 1, 2049.

2 At respondent’s discretion, respondent may purchase one or more annuity contracts from one or more life insurance companies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Stone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Stone v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a