Stone v. Scott

Fourth Circuit

Stone v. Scott

575 F. App'x 193

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 19, 2014·No. No. 14-1170·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steve Cary Stone appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. Scott, No. 1:14-cv-00027-MRDLH, 2014 WL 508257 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Steve Cary Stone appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. Scott, No. 1:14-cv-00027-MRDLH, 2014 WL 508257 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stone v. Scott, 575 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

575 F. App'x 193 (Stone v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.