Stone v. RW Lapine, Inc

764 N.W.2d 574, 483 Mich. 1007
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 8, 2009·No. 136438·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Reconsideration Granted May 8, 2009:

The motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is granted. The motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 17,2008, order is granted, in part. On reconsideration, we modify our order dated September 17,2008, by adding the following language at the end of the order: “Although the magistrate did not err by choosing to utilize MCL 418.371(6) to calculate the plaintiffs average weekly wage, he did err by failing to apply the specific formula provided in subsection 6. We remand this case to the Board of Magistrates for a recalculation of the plaintiffs average weekly wage using the formula stated in MCL 418.371(6).” In all other respects, the motion for reconsideration is denied. We do not retain jurisdiction. Court of Appeals No. 275684.

Corrigan, J. I would deny reconsideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone v. RW Lapine, Inc, 764 N.W.2d 574, 483 Mich. 1007 (Mich. 2009).

764 N.W.2d 574 (Stone v. RW Lapine, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. FEEZEL
764 N.W.2d 574 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)