Stone v. Nixon

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stone v. Nixon

505 S.W.3d 377, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203, 2016 WL 6872083

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 22, 2016

DocketWD 79997

StatusPublished

This text of 505 S.W.3d 377 (Stone v. Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stone v. Nixon, 505 S.W.3d 377, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203, 2016 WL 6872083 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester Stone appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for declaratory judgment against Jeremiah Nixon, Governor of Missouri. He contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the governor’s motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings based on what he contends was the mischaracterization by the governor of the facts, his claims, and the law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lester Stone appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for declaratory judgment against Jeremiah Nixon, Governor of Missouri. He contends that the trial court erred in sustaining the governor’s motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings based on what he contends was the mischaracterization by the governor of the facts, his claims, and the law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 S.W.3d 377, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1203, 2016 WL 6872083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-nixon-moctapp-2016.