Stone v. Murphy

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 21, 2004
• Docket: 03-2501
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2501

TAMMY M. STONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA KAY MURPHY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, District Judge. (CA-03-2241-2)

Submitted: August 27, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tammy M. Stone, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tammy M. Stone appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying her

civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Stone v. Murphy, No. CA-03-2241-2 (S.D.W. Va.

Nov. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -