Stone v. McClam
261 S.E.2d 128, 298 N.C. 572, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1655
This text of 261 S.E.2d 128 (Stone v. McClam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stone v. McClam, 261 S.E.2d 128, 298 N.C. 572, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1655 (N.C. 1979).
Opinion
D. Linwood STONE and J. A. Stone
v.
Marvin McCLAM, C. E. Smith, Norman Sanders, William R. Hocutt and FCX, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Boyce, Mitchell, Burns & Smith, for plaintiffs.
Sanford, Cannon, Adams & McCullough, for defendants.
Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 42 N.C.App. 393, 257 S.E.2d 78. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stone v. McClam
257 S.E.2d 78 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
261 S.E.2d 128, 298 N.C. 572, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-mcclam-nc-1979.