Stone v. Kamlet
235 A.D. 642
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 642 (Stone v. Kamlet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stone v. Kamlet, 235 A.D. 642 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Carswell, J., dissent, being of opinion that the case presents a question of fact which shoud have been submitted to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-kamlet-nyappdiv-1932.