Stone v. Jerome

1 How. N.P. 260
CourtCircuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan
DecidedJuly 1, 1877
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. N.P. 260 (Stone v. Jerome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 3rd Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. Jerome, 1 How. N.P. 260 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1877).

Opinion

The Court,

Walker,- J.:

Held that in general a physician’s undertaking, like that of a lawyer, is that he will exercise ordinary skill. (27 N. H. 471.) If one knowingly employs one who is not a regular physician, the latter is only required to exercise his best skill. (27 N. H. 460, 472; El well on Malpractice, 22, 29.) Plaintiff has proved that he practiced according to the hydropathic school. Witnesses for defendant belong to other schools, and testify, that plaintiff’s practice was bad. But is one school to pass judgment on another ?

Judgment for plaintiff for $112.19.

(A. D., 1868.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. N.P. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-jerome-micirct3-1877.