Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Stone v. Francisco Mining Co.

Stone v. Francisco Mining Co.

140 N.E. 438, 80 Ind. App. 348, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 133
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 29, 1923
DocketNo. 11,673
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 140 N.E. 438 (Stone v. Francisco Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. Francisco Mining Co., 140 N.E. 438, 80 Ind. App. 348, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 133 (Ind. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Remy, J.

The only question involved in this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the Industrial Board that the accident which resulted in the injury of appellant for which he claims compensation arose out of his employment. That was a question of fact for the Industrial Board. Miller v. Beil (1921), 75 Ind. App. 13, 129 N. E. 493; American Hominy Co. v. Davis (1920), 74 Ind. App. 622, 126 N. E. 703. See, also, Hopkins v. Michigan Sugar Co. (1914), 184 Mich. 87, 150 N. W. 325, L. R. A. 1916A 310; Fitzgerald v. Clark (1908), 2 K. B. 796. It appears from the record that there is competent evidence to sustain the finding.

Affirmed.

Dausman, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Runion v. Indiana Glass Co.
16 N.E.2d 961 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1938)
Olsen v. Canter
176 N.E. 27 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1931)
Indiana Limestone Company v. Morris
171 N.E. 925 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1930)
Bush v. Smith
171 N.E. 926 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1930)
Self v. Shirkie Coal Co.
166 N.E. 613 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 N.E. 438, 80 Ind. App. 348, 1923 Ind. App. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-francisco-mining-co-indctapp-1923.