Stone v. First National Bank

158 S.E.2d 382, 223 Ga. 804, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 706
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 22, 1967·No. 24364·Published

Opinion

Nichols, Justice.

1. No grounds for an equitable accounting are alleged, and an accounting may be had at law. Code § 10-102; Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 SE 538); Gifford v. Jackson, 223 Ga. 155 (154 SE2d 224).

2. This case falls within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals since it involves a declaratory judgment and temporary restraining order to maintain the status quo between the parties until the accounting may be had, and the prayer for permanent injunction without alleging facts which it is claimed would support the prayer for such relief is insufficient to place jurisdiction in this court. See Hudon v. North Atlanta, 219 Ga. 179 (132 SE2d 74), and citations.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur. J. Ralph McClelland, Jr., for appellant. Edward P. Ellis, Walter W. Calhoun, Joe W. Gerstein, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone v. First National Bank, 158 S.E.2d 382, 223 Ga. 804, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 706 (Ga. 1967).

158 S.E.2d 382 (Stone v. First National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gifford v. Jackson
154 S.E.2d 224 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)
Hudon v. North Atlanta
132 S.E.2d 74 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Burress v. Montgomery
97 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)