Stone v. Farmers' Bank
This text of 174 U.S. 409 (Stone v. Farmers' Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.
The decree below, so far as it granted the relief prayed as against the defendants other than the city of Georgetown and the county of Scott, is affirmed by a divided court. The decree, so far as it adjudicated against the complainant and in favor of the defendants the city of Georgetown and the county of Scott, those defendants not having been parties or privies to the judgments pleaded as res judicata, must be affirmed upon the authority of the decision in Citizens’ Savings Bank of Owensboro v. City of Owensboro and A. M. C. Simmons, Tax Collector, 173 U. S. 636.
And it is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 U.S. 409, 19 S. Ct. 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-farmers-bank-scotus-1899.