Stone v. Devlin

13 N.Y.S. 957, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1764

This text of 13 N.Y.S. 957 (Stone v. Devlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. Devlin, 13 N.Y.S. 957, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1764 (superctny 1891).

Opinion

Dugro, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury, and an order denying a motion for a new trial upon the minutes. When the plaintiff rested his case there was evidence from which the jury could properly conclude that the materials in suit were sold and delivered to the defendant, and that he was justly indebted to the plaintiff for the amount of the verdict. The plaintiff’s case did not show that Rutherford was defendant’s partner. The charge presented the question at issue fully and fairly, and was subject to no valid exception. The judgment and order should be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.Y.S. 957, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-devlin-superctny-1891.