Stone v. Dalton

1 Mass. L. Rptr. 213
Massachusetts Superior Court·Decided October 15, 1993·No. No. 92-2746·Published

Opinion

Fremont-Smith, J.

I conclude that my decision and order so affect the ultimate merits of the above-captioned action that the matter ought to be determined by the Appeals Court before any further proceedings in this Court, because a determinative decision either way at this juncture would, if reversed on appeal, taint all further proceedings, including the trial. Accordingly, I hereby certify the legal question addressed in my decision and order to the Appeals Court to enable that court to clarify the issue so as to permit pre-trial discovery and the trial itself to proceed on a legally correct basis. See G.L.c. 231 §111; Mass.R.Civ.P. 64; Heck v. Commonwealth, 397 Mass. 336, 338-39 (1986); and Peerless Insurance Company v. Hartford Insurance Company, 34 Mass.App.Ct. 534, 535 (1993).

Pursuant to Mass. R.A.P. 5, the defendants shall be designated the appellants in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stone v. Dalton, 1 Mass. L. Rptr. 213 (Mass. Ct. App. 1993).

1 Mass. L. Rptr. 213 (Stone v. Dalton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peerless Insurance v. Hartford Insurance
613 N.E.2d 125 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1993)
Heck v. Commonwealth
491 N.E.2d 613 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1986)