Stone v. Bennett

Fourth Circuit

Stone v. Bennett

397 F. App'x 853

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2010·No. No. 10-7006·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leon A. Stone appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stone’s motions for appointment of counsel, bail or release pending appeal, and to enforce judgment and authorize discovery and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. Bennett, No. 2:10-cv-00280-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Leon A. Stone appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Stone’s motions for appointment of counsel, bail or release pending appeal, and to enforce judgment and authorize discovery and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stone v. Bennett, No. 2:10-cv-00280-JBF-FBS (E.D.Va. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stone v. Bennett, 397 F. App'x 853 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

397 F. App'x 853 (Stone v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related