Stone v. Albertson's, Inc.
This text of 51 F. App'x 753 (Stone v. Albertson's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
John Winston Stone and Shirley Stone appeal pro se from the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) dismissing as moot and for lack of standing their appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order overruling the Stones’ objection to Albertson’s proof of claim. We review decisions of the BAP de novo and independently review the bankruptcy court’s rulings. Mitchell v. Franchise Tax Board, State of California (In re Mitchell), 209 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm.
Because Albertson’s waived its proof of claim, the Stones’ objection to Albertson’s proof of claim is moot. See United States Internal Revenue Serv. v. Pattullo (In re Pattullo), 271 F.3d 898, 901 (9th Cir.2001) (order) (dismissing appeal where the court of appeals was unable to grant relief). Accordingly, we affirm.
The Stones’ motion to file a late reply brief is granted. The brief submitted on March 29, 2002, shall be filed.
The Stones’ remaining contentions lack merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 F. App'x 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-albertsons-inc-ca9-2002.