Stone v. Albertson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Stone v. Albertson

1924 OK 754, 229 P. 227, 100 Okla. 254, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 990

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 16, 1924·No. 13468·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This is an appeal from the district court of Creek county. The plaintiff in error filed brief December 20, 1922. No brief has been filed by the defendants in error_ and no extension of time has been given to file same and no reason has been assigned by the defendants in error as to why they have not filed brief. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to reasonably sustain the assignments of error, and under the rule of this court, the record will not be searched to find some theory upon which the judgment of the lower court may be sustained.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

JARMAN, C.

This is an appeal from the district court of Creek county. The plaintiff in error filed brief December 20, 1922. No brief has been filed by the defendants in error_ and no extension of time has been given to file same and no reason has been assigned by the defendants in error as to why they have not filed brief. The brief of the plaintiff in error appears to reasonably sustain the assignments of error, and under the rule of this court, the record will not be searched to find some theory upon which the judgment of the lower court may be sustained.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Stone v. Albertson, 1924 OK 754, 229 P. 227, 100 Okla. 254, 1924 Okla. LEXIS 990 (Okla. 1924).

Pincite

1924 OK 754 (Stone v. Albertson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.