Stone v. Addy
This text of 46 N.E. 431 (Stone v. Addy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The former verdict and judgment might have gone on the ground that the defendant had committed no act of conversion at the time when the action was brought, and therefore they did not preclude the plaintiff from maintaining his present action. Lea v. Lea, 99 Mass. 493. Stapleton v. Dee, 132 Mass. 279. Foye v. Patch, 132 Mass. 105. Bugbee v. Davis, 167 Mass. 33.
The exceptions being obviously untenable under the previous decisions, we pass by the question whether the defendant lost his right of exception by omitting to give due notice of the filing of the exceptions.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 N.E. 431, 168 Mass. 26, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-addy-mass-1897.