Stone v. Addy

46 N.E. 431, 168 Mass. 26, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 143
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 N.E. 431 (Stone v. Addy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stone v. Addy, 46 N.E. 431, 168 Mass. 26, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 143 (Mass. 1897).

Opinion

Allen, J.

The former verdict and judgment might have gone on the ground that the defendant had committed no act of conversion at the time when the action was brought, and therefore they did not preclude the plaintiff from maintaining his present action. Lea v. Lea, 99 Mass. 493. Stapleton v. Dee, 132 Mass. 279. Foye v. Patch, 132 Mass. 105. Bugbee v. Davis, 167 Mass. 33.

The exceptions being obviously untenable under the previous decisions, we pass by the question whether the defendant lost his right of exception by omitting to give due notice of the filing of the exceptions.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whittemore v. Selectmen of Falmouth
22 N.E.2d 664 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 N.E. 431, 168 Mass. 26, 1897 Mass. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-v-addy-mass-1897.