Stone Lumber Co. v. Snow

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Stone Lumber Co. v. Snow

85 So. 2d 654, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 609

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 5, 1956

DocketNo. 20658

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 85 So. 2d 654 (Stone Lumber Co. v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stone Lumber Co. v. Snow, 85 So. 2d 654, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 609 (La. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

REGAN, Judge.

This litigation emanates from the same building contract, the facts and pertinent issues of which are the same as those found in the case of Moore Steel, Inc., v. Snow, La.App., 85 So.2d 648, with the exception of the amount thereof and the judgment therefor which is $815.09.

In the case of Moore Steel, Inc., v. Snow, we were of the opinion, for the reasons assigned therein, that the contractor, Charles Snow, and his surety, Maryland Casualty Company, were liable in solido to the plaintiff for the amount of its claim, plus costs and ten percent attorney’s fees and, by virtue of the stipulation entered into between counsel for the Maryland Casualty Company and counsel for Charles Snow and Paul D. Snow, Jr., the Maryland Casualty [655]*655Company is entitled ,to judgment against Paul D. Snow, Jr. and Charles Snow for the judgment rendered against it in the above entitled suit.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

REGAN, Judge.

This litigation emanates from the same building contract, the facts and pertinent issues of which are the same as those found in the case of Moore Steel, Inc., v. Snow, La.App., 85 So.2d 648, with the exception of the amount thereof and the judgment therefor which is $815.09.

In the case of Moore Steel, Inc., v. Snow, we were of the opinion, for the reasons assigned therein, that the contractor, Charles Snow, and his surety, Maryland Casualty Company, were liable in solido to the plaintiff for the amount of its claim, plus costs and ten percent attorney’s fees and, by virtue of the stipulation entered into between counsel for the Maryland Casualty Company and counsel for Charles Snow and Paul D. Snow, Jr., the Maryland Casualty [655]*655Company is entitled ,to judgment against Paul D. Snow, Jr. and Charles Snow for the judgment rendered against it in the above entitled suit.

For the reasons assigned the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 2d 654, 1956 La. App. LEXIS 609, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-lumber-co-v-snow-lactapp-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack