Stone

Court of Claims

Stone

159 Ct. Cl. 610, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 176, 1962 WL 1625

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 17, 1962

DocketNo. 581-58

StatusPublished

This text of 159 Ct. Cl. 610 (Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stone, 159 Ct. Cl. 610, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 176, 1962 WL 1625 (cc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Civilian pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible formerly employed as Regional Administrator, International Region, Civil Aeronautics Administration, sues to recover back pay on the ground that his dismissal on April 22,1957, for cause, was procedurally defective and was arbitrary and capricious. The case came before the court on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto and oral argument of cousel, the court, on December [611]*61117,1962, concluded that plaintiff bad failed to show that his removal was procedurally defective or was arbitrary, capricious or unsupported by substantial evidence, and, on the basis of the decision of the court in Hadlock v. United States, ante, p. 52, and the cases cited therein, it was concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to recover and the petition was dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion for rehearing was denied February 6, 1963.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Civilian pay; dismissal. — Plaintiff, a veteran preference eligible formerly employed as Regional Administrator, International Region, Civil Aeronautics Administration, sues to recover back pay on the ground that his dismissal on April 22,1957, for cause, was procedurally defective and was arbitrary and capricious. The case came before the court on plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto and oral argument of cousel, the court, on December [611]*61117,1962, concluded that plaintiff bad failed to show that his removal was procedurally defective or was arbitrary, capricious or unsupported by substantial evidence, and, on the basis of the decision of the court in Hadlock v. United States, ante, p. 52, and the cases cited therein, it was concluded that plaintiff was not entitled to recover and the petition was dismissed. Plaintiff’s motion for rehearing was denied February 6, 1963.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 Ct. Cl. 610, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 176, 1962 WL 1625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stone-cc-1962.