Stolz v. Ginsburg

217 A.D. 701
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action cannot be maintained by the plaintiff under section 59 of the Stock Corporation Law (See Billings v. Trask, 30 Hun, 314); nor under section 47 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1910, because that section, as amended, relates only to the property of the corporation. Plaintiff claims the complaint may be sustained under section 91-a of the General Corporation Law. There is not in the complaint, however, any allegation of negligence nor, stripped of legal conclusions, any allegation showing injury to or losses of the funds or property of the corporation, which allegations are necessary under that section. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stolz v. Ginsburg, 217 A.D. 701 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

217 A.D. 701 (Stolz v. Ginsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc. v. Frye
168 N.E.2d 669 (New York Court of Appeals, 1960)
Waters v. Spalt
22 Misc. 2d 937 (New York Supreme Court, 1948)
Klages v. Cohen
146 F.2d 641 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Bryce v. National City Bank
93 F.2d 300 (Second Circuit, 1937)
Bryce v. National City Bank of New Rochelle
17 F. Supp. 792 (S.D. New York, 1937)