Stoltz v. Datascope Corp.
This text of 580 A.2d 294 (Stoltz v. Datascope Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 1990, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Superior Court quashing the appeal is vacated and the matter is [294]*294remanded to that court for disposition of the appeal on the merits.
Application of Pa.R.A.P. 311(a)(1), as amended March 31, 1989, effective July 1, 1989, to this case is not “just and practicable,” especially in view of the time and money expended by the petitioners in filing, briefing, and arguing their appeal before the effective date of the amended rule, indeed before the amended rule was even published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 A.2d 294, 525 Pa. 293, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoltz-v-datascope-corp-pa-1990.