Stolper v. Straughn

175 Misc. 87, 23 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2340
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 17, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 175 Misc. 87 (Stolper v. Straughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stolper v. Straughn, 175 Misc. 87, 23 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1940).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

Defendant’s testimony as to its aims and objects is not entitled to credence. I find that defendant is not a labor union or a labor organization of any kind. It is not a member of any single trade or class of trades, and its demands, likewise, are unconnected with any specific industry. The picketing sought to be enjoined is unrelated to any question of wages, hours of labor, unionization or betterment of working conditions. A labor dispute within the purview of paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of subdivision 10 of section 876-a of the Civil Practice Act, is, therefore, not involved. As that is the only issue presented, a permanent injunction against further picketing must be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lifshitz v. Straughn
261 A.D. 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 Misc. 87, 23 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1940 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stolper-v-straughn-nysupct-1940.