Stolnick v. Hut
This text of 16 A.D.2d 823 (Stolnick v. Hut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendant Hut appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 5, 1961, as denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 823, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stolnick-v-hut-nyappdiv-1962.