Stoller v. Folmar

260 So. 2d 532, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6977
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 4, 1972·No. No. 71-703·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals a summary final judgment in an action concerning a referral contract between two practicing attorneys. In the trial court, the sole issue was the meaning of the written contract. The matters pleaded in the answer did not constitute a legal defense to the action. The court correctly determined that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the appellee was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The court properly entered summary judgment in accordance with the terms of the contract. See Duprey v. United Services Automobile Association, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 57; also see Sterling v. Miller, 1956, 2 A.D.2d 900, 157 N.Y.S.2d 145.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoller v. Folmar, 260 So. 2d 532, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6977 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

260 So. 2d 532 (Stoller v. Folmar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stoller v. Folmar
266 So. 2d 674 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)