Stoller v. Folmar

260 So. 2d 532, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6977
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1972
DocketNo. 71-703
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 So. 2d 532 (Stoller v. Folmar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoller v. Folmar, 260 So. 2d 532, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6977 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals a summary final judgment in an action concerning a referral contract between two practicing attorneys. In the trial court, the sole issue was the meaning of the written contract. The matters pleaded in the answer did not constitute a legal defense to the action. The court correctly determined that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the appellee was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The court properly entered summary judgment in accordance with the terms of the contract. See Duprey v. United Services Automobile Association, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 57; also see Sterling v. Miller, 1956, 2 A.D.2d 900, 157 N.Y.S.2d 145.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stoller v. Folmar
266 So. 2d 674 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 So. 2d 532, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoller-v-folmar-fladistctapp-1972.