Stoll v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

811 S.W.2d 793, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 1991 WL 97980
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1991·No. No. 58783·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of defendant in plaintiff’s wrongful death action.

In 1987 this court ordered the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of [794]*794defendant and issued a mandate. State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Ryan, 741 S.W.2d 828 (Mo.App.1987). Relying upon Wilkes v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 762 S.W.2d 27 (Mo. banc. 1988), plaintiffs petitioned the trial court for “relief from judgment or to vacate final order in prohibition.” The trial court denied the motion, stating that it was “without power to modify, alter, amend, or otherwise depart from the appellate judgment,” citing Davis v. J. C. Nichols Company, 761 S.W.2d 735, 737 (Mo.App.1988). We agree.

No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have ho precedential value. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoll v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission, 811 S.W.2d 793, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 1991 WL 97980 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

811 S.W.2d 793 (Stoll v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
762 S.W.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1988)
Davis v. J.C. Nichols Co.
761 S.W.2d 735 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1988)
State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Ryan
741 S.W.2d 828 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)