Stoll v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission
This text of 811 S.W.2d 793 (Stoll v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s order entering summary judgment in favor of defendant in plaintiff’s wrongful death action.
In 1987 this court ordered the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of [794]*794defendant and issued a mandate. State ex rel. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Ryan, 741 S.W.2d 828 (Mo.App.1987). Relying upon Wilkes v. Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission, 762 S.W.2d 27 (Mo. banc. 1988), plaintiffs petitioned the trial court for “relief from judgment or to vacate final order in prohibition.” The trial court denied the motion, stating that it was “without power to modify, alter, amend, or otherwise depart from the appellate judgment,” citing Davis v. J. C. Nichols Company, 761 S.W.2d 735, 737 (Mo.App.1988). We agree.
No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have ho precedential value. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
811 S.W.2d 793, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 1991 WL 97980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoll-v-missouri-highway-transportation-commission-moctapp-1991.