Stoll v. Curtis
This text of 238 A.D. 800 (Stoll v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff's motion to strike out the defense in paragraph fifth and the partial defense in paragraph sixth reversed on the law, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten doEars costs, with leave to plead over in ten days from the entry of the order herein, on authority of Lynde v. Curtis (ante, p. 795), decided herewith. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, CarsweE, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoll-v-curtis-nyappdiv-1933.