Stolberg v. Stolberg
This text of 200 N.W.2d 110 (Stolberg v. Stolberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following a judgment of divorce on *306 October 8, 1970, obligating the defendant husband to pay $27 per week for each of the parties’ three minor children, defendant, on February 11, 1971, filed a motion to modify the judgment to decrease child support payments.
The support provisions of the judgment of divorce read that "this amount (the $27 per week per child) of support is predicated upon defendant’s representation that his present income does not exceed eight hundred twenty ($820) dollars per month”.
The Wayne County Friend of the Court recommended that support be reduced to $23 per week per child and the court, hearing oral arguments by counsel and no testimony, adopted the recommendations of the Friend of the Court over the objections of plaintiff’s counsel.
Plaintiff contends that the court should have received testimony before making a ruling on the motions and that the Friend of the Court report cannot be used as evidence over the objection of either party to the matter.
We agree. Reversed on the authority of Krachun v Krachun, 355 Mich 167 (1959); Ewald v Ewald, 14 Mich App 665 (1968); Stros v Stros, 25 Mich App 154 (1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 N.W.2d 110, 41 Mich. App. 305, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stolberg-v-stolberg-michctapp-1972.