Stolarski v. State

165 Tex. Crim. 611
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 19, 1958·No. No. 29,357·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture case, the appellate procedure relative to which is governed by the rule in civil cases.

Rule 414, Vernon’s Civil Procedure, requiring the filing of briefs, has not been complied with.

The motion of the state to dismiss the appeal for that reason, under Rule 415, Vernon’s Civil Procedure, is well taken. Tatum, et al, v. State, 148 Texas Cr. Rep. 425, 187 S.W. 2d 989; Gaither, et al, v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 503, 244 S.W. 2d 209; Bell, et al, v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 210.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stolarski v. State, 165 Tex. Crim. 611 (Tex. 1958).

165 Tex. Crim. 611 (Stolarski v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Price v. State
856 S.W.2d 226 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)