Stolarski v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Stolarski v. State

165 Tex. Crim. 611

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 19, 1958

DocketNo. 29,357

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 165 Tex. Crim. 611 (Stolarski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stolarski v. State, 165 Tex. Crim. 611 (Tex. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture case, the appellate procedure relative to which is governed by the rule in civil cases.

Rule 414, Vernon’s Civil Procedure, requiring the filing of briefs, has not been complied with.

The motion of the state to dismiss the appeal for that reason, under Rule 415, Vernon’s Civil Procedure, is well taken. Tatum, et al, v. State, 148 Texas Cr. Rep. 425, 187 S.W. 2d 989; Gaither, et al, v. State, 156 Texas Cr. Rep. 503, 244 S.W. 2d 209; Bell, et al, v. State, 244 S.W. 2d 210.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI