Stokes v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stokes v. Wright

244 A.D. 886

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs, All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and the facts on the ground that the finding of the court that there wás a delivery of the deed in escrow is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action of ejectment.) Present —- Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs, All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and the facts on the ground that the finding of the court that there wás a delivery of the deed in escrow is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence, (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action of ejectment.) Present —- Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Stokes v. Wright, 244 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

244 A.D. 886 (Stokes v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.