Stokes v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development

Fourth Circuit

Stokes v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development

191 F. App'x 177

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2006·No. No. 05-2430·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda W. Stokes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Stokes’ employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stokes v. HUD, No. CA-05-239-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda W. Stokes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in Stokes’ employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stokes v. HUD, No. CA-05-239-3 (E.D.Va. Dec. 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Stokes v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development, 191 F. App'x 177 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

191 F. App'x 177 (Stokes v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.